Construct an inference, then try to break it. The game rewards disciplined evidence chains and counterexample thinking.
YOUR OBJECTIVEBuild a five-stage inference that connects evidence to a conclusion without smuggling in an unsupported assumption.
HOW TO PLAYSelect five clues in order. Then test the inference. If it fails, the audit identifies the broken link and gives you a counterexample prompt.
TEXTUAL LENSNyāya traditions of anumāna and structured reasoning; the game is a modern learning abstraction of inference, not a complete account of Nyāya epistemology.
Construct and break an inference
Case 1/5Clues 0/5Score 0
Build in this order: proposition → reason → example → application → conclusion.
A good reason is not merely plausible. Test whether the reason is actually connected to the conclusion and whether a counterexample can break it.
Learning note: This is a modern interactive model inspired by selected texts and traditions. It is not a substitute for reading the primary sources, and the game does not claim that one interpretation represents every Sanātana tradition.
